Chadwell v. Commissioner of Social Security
Cindy Lee Chadwell |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
3:2018cv01205 |
October 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Henry Lee Adams |
Monte C Richardson |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 PROOF of service by Cindy Lee Chadwell (Berger, Erik) |
Filing 6 PROOF of service by Cindy Lee Chadwell (Berger, Erik) |
Filing 5 Affidavit of SUMMONS returned executed by Cindy Lee Chadwell. Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/22/2018, answer due 12/21/2018. (Berger, Erik) Modified on 10/31/2018 to edit text(KKH). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 1 (with attachment: # 1 - Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge). Signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/15/2018. (MO) |
Filing 3 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (KKH) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, Attorney General, US Attorney. (KKH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number JAX029243 filed by Cindy Lee Chadwell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.