Beasley v. Godwin et al
Freddie Beasley |
Sgt. James and Warden J. Godwin |
3:2018cv01338 |
November 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Brian J Davis |
James R Klindt |
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sgt. James with Jury Demand. Terminating J. Godwin filed by Freddie Beasley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Freddie Beasley.(AEJ) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint on a civil rights complaint form by December 19, 2018, including service copies; directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form. Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt on 11/26/2018. (KLC) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/16/2018. (CKS) |
Filing 2 MOTION (partial) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Freddie Beasley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Inmate Trust Fund Account Statements)(AEJ) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J. Godwin, James filed by Freddie Beasley.(AEJ) (no service copies, postmark 11/8/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.