Brooks v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
Clifton McNeil Brooks, Sr. |
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections |
3:2018cv01373 |
November 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Patricia D Barksdale |
Brian J Davis |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT pursuant to this Court's Order entered on 11/26/2018, judgment is hereby entered the Petition (Doc. 1) is Denied, and this action is Dismissed with Prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/27/2018. (PAM) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying #1 the petition, dismissing the action with prejudice, with instructions to the Clerk; denying a certificate of appealability, with instructions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 11/26/2018. (LDO) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/26/2018. (CKS) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Clifton McNeil Brooks, Sr. re: #1 Petition for writ of habeas corpus by Clifton McNeil Brooks, Sr. (PAM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus -State. Filing fee $ 5.00, receipt number JAX029565 filed by Clifton McNeil Brooks, Sr.(PAM) Received two service copies. See left side of file. Modified on 11/19/2018 (PAM). No postmark reflected |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.