Malone v. Doe (Suwannee County)
| Artavious Bernard Malone |
| Secretary, Department of Corrections, John Doe, Wexford Health and John Doe 6-7 |
| 3:2018cv01523 |
| December 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Monte C Richardson |
| Harvey E Schlesinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER deferring ruling on #2 Plaintiff's request to proceed as a pauper; directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by 3/8/2019; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 2/7/2019. (JLD)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 1 (MGG) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to counsel of new case number 3:18-cv-1523-HES-MCR and judge assignment (signed by deputy clerk). (KKH) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER transferring this case to the Jacksonville Division. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/27/2018. (SM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Artavious Bernard Malone. (BES) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Wexford Health filed by Artavious Bernard Malone.(BES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
