Nelson v. Howard et al
| Jeffrey Nelson |
| Officer J. Nash, Sgt. L. Debois, C.O. D. Rather, Officer W. I. Archie, Officer J. T. Burnette, Captain Nacey Crawford, Sgt. Stoke, Sgt. W. I. Howard, Jr. and Lt. R. Lineblade |
| 3:2019cv00098 |
| January 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Brian J Davis |
| Monte C Richardson |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT that pursuant to this Court's Order, filed January 24, 2019, judgment is hereby entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 1/25/2019. (AEJ) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 1/24/2019. (CAW)
|
| Filing 2 AMENDED STANDING ORDER notifying institution regarding inmate claim of suicidal intent or other imminent physical harm. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 1/11/2018. (AEJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against W. I. Archie, J. T. Burnette, Nacey Crawford, L. Debois, W. I. Howard, Jr, R. Lineblade, J. Nash, D. Rather, Stoke filed by Jeffrey Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AEJ) (no IFP, no service copies, post marked 1/17/19) Modified on 1/23/2019 to reflect corrected name of Plaintiff. (AEJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
