Jones v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
| Robert Jones |
| Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General |
| 3:2019cv00230 |
| February 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Patricia D Barksdale |
| Harvey E Schlesinger |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mail returned as Undeliverable re: #3 Judgment, #2 Order dismissing case. Mail resent to Robert Jones at new address at FCI Coleman Low. (TSW) Modified on 4/5/2019 Forms sent as directed(TSW). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of change of address by Robert Jones (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(TSW) |
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT is hereby entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 3/1/2019. (TSW) |
Filing 2
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice; directing the Clerk to enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice, terminate any pending motions and close this case; directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff the forms set forth in the Order; SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS Signed by Senior Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger on 2/27/2019. (MGG)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal filed by Robert Jones.(no filing fee, no IFP, no service copies, post mark dated 2/19/2019)(TSW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
