Boatright v. Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections et al
| Arthur Dewayne Boatright |
| Florida Attorney General and Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections |
| 3:2019cv00388 |
| April 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Timothy J Corrigan |
| Joel B Toomey |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT that pursuant to this Court's Order entered April 8, 2019, Judgment is hereby entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 4/9/2019. (JSG) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Petitioner's Motion and dismissing this case without prejudice; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 4/8/2019. (JLD)
|
| Filing 2 AMENDED MOTION to Dismiss and Remand Due to Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and to Incur the Jurisdiction of the United States District Court Middle District of Florida by Arthur Dewayne Boatright. (JSG) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joel B. Toomey. |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Dismiss and Remand Due to Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and to Incurr the Jurisdiction of The United States District Court Middle District of Florida by Arthur Dewayne Boatright. (KKH) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joel B. Toomey. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
