Babichev v. Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections et al (Duval County)
Vasiliy Babichev |
Florida Attorney General and Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections |
3:2019cv00792 |
July 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Brian J Davis |
Monte C Richardson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER to respond and show cause why the petition should not be granted. Petitioner has 90 days to reply to the petition response. Clerk is directed to serve the petition. Response to petition due by 2/24/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 10/17/2018. (Attachments: #1 Petition Doc 1, #2 Track Notice Doc 3, #3 Notice Doc 4)(CAW) |
FEES paid by Vasiliy Babichev (Filing fee $5.00 receipt number JAX031467) (AFC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Vasiliy Babichev re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice (RH) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 7/8/2019. (CKS) |
Filing 2 ORDER directing Petitioner to pay the filing fee or file an affidavit of indigency by 8/7/2019; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 7/3/2019. (CAW) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 4th Judicial Circuit, Duval County - 2010-CF-8398 filed by Vasiliy Babichev. (No IFP provided. Two service copies provided. Postmarked 6/28/19.)(KKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.