Nelms v. Commissioner of Social Security
Sharon Elaine Nelms |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
3:2019cv00962 |
August 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Marcia Morales Howard |
Monte C Richardson |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 PROOF of service by Sharon Elaine Nelms (Berger, Erik) |
Filing 7 PROOF of service by Sharon Elaine Nelms (Berger, Erik) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed by Sharon Elaine Nelms. Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/3/2019, answer due 11/4/2019. (Berger, Erik) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (RH) |
Filing 4 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/10.(RH) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Cosent Letter and Form)(JW) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Marcia Morales Howard and Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. New case number: 3:19-cv-962-J-34MCR. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15823489) filed by Sharon Elaine Nelms. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Berger, Erik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.