Acosta, Inc. v. National Fruit Product Company, Incorporated
| Acosta, Inc. |
| National Fruit Product Company, Incorporated |
| 3:2019cv01271 |
| November 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Harvey E Schlesinger |
| Joel B Toomey |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Wachs, Alan) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Acosta, Inc.. (Crawford, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #2 Amended Complaint by National Fruit Product Company, Incorporated.(Morreale, Frank) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 2 (MGG) |
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law. Defendant shall have up to and including November 15, 2019 to respond to the Amended Complaint #2. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel B. Toomey on 11/6/2019. (TSP)
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by National Fruit Product Company, Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent National Fruit Product Company, Incorporated for National Fruit Product Company, Incorporated.. (Morreale, Frank) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by National Fruit Product Company, Incorporated. (Morreale, Frank) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for leave to amend case style by Acosta, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(PAM) Originally filed in State Court |
| Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against National Fruit Product Company, Incorporated filed by Acosta, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(PAM) Modified on 11/1/2019 (PAM). Originally filed in State Court |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fourth Judicial Circuit, Duval County, FL, case number 16-2019-CA-006708-XXXX-MA filed in State Court on 9/23/2019. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number JAX031984 filed by National Fruit Product Company, Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 State Court COMPLAINT Ex 2, #3 Exhibit Ex 3 Amended Complaint, #4 State Court Pending Motions Ex. 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 State Court Docket Sheet, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(PAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Acosta, Inc. v. National Fruit Product Company, Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Acosta, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alan S. Wachs |
| Represented By: | Joseph C. Crawford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: National Fruit Product Company, Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Frank Edward Morreale |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
