Mosley v. Pisces 2, Inc.
Daimeon Mosley |
Pisces 2, Inc. and Pisces 2, Inc. doing business as McDonald's |
3:2019cv01399 |
December 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Brian J Davis |
Monte C Richardson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ANSWER to court interrogatories re: #4 Related case order and track 2 notice by Daimeon Mosley. (Weiss, Jason) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Pisces 2, Inc. (Kroell, Victoria) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Daimeon Mosley. (Weiss, Jason) Modified on 1/17/2020 to edit text (PAM). |
Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Pisces 2, Inc..(Kroell, Victoria) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 2 and ADA Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 12/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Letter and Form)(CKS) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Pisces 2, Inc. (PAM) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Brian J. Davis and Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. New case number: 03:19-cv-1399-J-39MCR. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pisces 2, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16211748) filed by Daimeon Mosley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Weiss, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.