Frazier v. McClellan et al
| Kelvin Frazier |
| L McCollough, F.S.P. West Unit Mental Health Dept., G Fisher, J. McClellan, C. Neel, T Russell and J Beighley |
| 3:2020cv00227 |
| March 9, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Patricia D Barksdale |
| Marcia Morales Howard |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER of USCA GRANTED as to extension of time to pay the filing fee re #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Kelvin Frazier. EOD: 04/30/2020; USCA number: 20-11385. (AFC)
|
| Filing 15 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to USCA consisting of copies of notice of appeal, order/judgment being appealed, and motion, if applicable to USCA re #14 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal, #2 Order Dkt. 4, #3 Order Dkt, 5)(AFC) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Judgment, #4 Order dismissing case by Kelvin Frazier. Filing fee not paid. (AFC) |
| Filing 13 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to USCA consisting of copies of notice of appeal construed as an amended notice of appeal, order/judgment being appealed, and motion, if applicable to USCA re #12 Notice of appeal. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal, #2 Order Dkt. 9)(AFC) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL construed as an AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #9 Order on Motion for Reconsideration/Clarification by Kelvin Frazier. Filing fee not paid. (AFC) |
| Filing 11 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to USCA consisting of copies of notice of appeal, order/judgment being appealed, and motion, if applicable to USCA re #10 Notice of appeal. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal, #2 Order Dkt. 9)(AFC) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #9 Order on Motion for Reconsideration / Clarification by Kelvin Frazier. Filing fee not paid. (AFC) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying #7 Motion for Reconsideration / Clarification and overruling #8 Objection. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 3/31/2020. (ACT)
|
| Filing 8 OBJECTION re #4 Order dismissing case by Kelvin Frazier. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(KKH) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration, specifically titled "Motion for Reconsideration of the Filing Bar to U.S. District Judge to Withdraw his Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice" re #4 Order dismissing case by Kelvin Frazier. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JSG) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE, specifically titled, "Motion of Courtesy Copy of All Documents Filed Under the Mail Box Rule" by Kelvin Frazier (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit)(KKH) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT that pursuant to this Court's Order, entered March 13, 2020, is hereby entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 3/17/2020. (RH) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 3/12/2020. (CAW)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 3/12/2020. (JW) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kelvin Frazier. (RH) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Kelvin Frazier. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (postmarked 2/19/20, no service copies)(RH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
