O'TOOLE v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,
| DEBORAH O'TOOLE, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, and Deborah O'Toole |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., |
| 3:2020cv00288 |
| March 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Marcia Morales Howard |
| Joel B Toomey |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by C. Ryan Morgan on behalf of Deborah O'Toole (Morgan, C.) Modified on 3/27/2020 (PAM). Counsel notified to use entire case number on future pleadings |
Filing 4
NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2 - and FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 3/26/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Letter and Form)(JW)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. (PAM) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Marcia Morales Howard and Magistrate Judge Joel B. Toomey. New case number: 3:20-cv-288-J-34JBT. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT DEBORAH O'TOOLE, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, against JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16621951) filed by DEBORAH O'TOOLE, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated,. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Frisch, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
