LOTSolutions, Inc. et al v. Safeware, The Insurance Agency, Inc.
| LOTSolutions, Inc., Insurance Company of the South, Response Indemnity Company of California and Lyndon Southern Insurance Company |
| Safeware, The Insurance Agency, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00385 |
| April 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Timothy J Corrigan |
| Monte C Richardson |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 Respondent's Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Claimants' Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award. Despite Claimants' opposition to the Motion, the Court finds it appropriate to allow the requested extension. Respondent's response to the Petition shall be filed on or before June 26, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 6/1/2020. (ADM)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to the Petition for Confirmation of Arbitration Award filed by Insurance Company of the South, LOTSolutions, Inc., Lyndon Southern Insurance Company, Response Indemnity Company of California. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - April 16, 2020 email, #2 Exhibit B - May 11, 2020 email)(Butler, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to #1 Petition for Confirmation of Arbitration Award by Safeware, The Insurance Agency, Inc. (Reck, Kevin). Modified on 6/1/2020 to create docket entry relationship (JSG). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin A. Reck on behalf of Safeware, The Insurance Agency, Inc. (Reck, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 PROOF of service executed on 5/8/2020 by Insurance Company of the South, LOTSolutions, Inc., Lyndon Southern Insurance Company, Response Indemnity Company of California (Holt, Edward). Modified on 5/18/2020 to edit text (JSG). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 5/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent to US Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction letter)(MD) |
|
Filing 4
ENDORSED ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. If Thomas J. Butler has not already done so, he shall immediately register for a login and password for electronic filing at the Court's website at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 4/27/2020. (ADM)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Thomas J. Butler to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. 113A-16726929 for $150 by Insurance Company of the South, LOTSolutions, Inc., Lyndon Southern Insurance Company, Response Indemnity Company of California. (Holt, Edward) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Timothy J. Corrigan and Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. New case number: 3:20-cv-385-J-32MCR. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 PETITION to Confirm Arbitration Award against Safeware, The Insurance Agency, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16710817) filed by Response Indemnity Company of California, Lyndon Southern Insurance Company, LOTSolutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Provider Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Interim Order and Award, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Holt, Edward) Modified to edit text on 4/17/2020 (KKH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
