Hines v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
| Charles Hines |
| Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections |
| 3:2020cv00833 |
| July 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Patricia D Barksdale |
| Brian J Davis |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 petitioner's motion for extension of time; amended petition and filing fee or affidavit of indigency due by 11/2/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on 9/3/2020. (CAW)
|
| Filing 4 Notice to court and or MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Charles Hines. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JDR) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/4/2020. (CKS) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing petitioner to file an amended petition and pay the filing fee or file an affidavit of indigency by 9/2/2020; direction to the clerk. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on 7/30/2020. (CAW)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State filed by Charles Hines. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Mailing Envelope)(KEM)(No service copies provided, No IFP or payment received.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
