Cotton v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
| Artavious V. Cotton |
| Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General |
| 3:2020cv01249 |
| November 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Timothy J Corrigan |
| James R Klindt |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT That pursuant to the Court's order entered on November 16, 2020, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/17/2020. (KKH) |
Filing 4
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 11/16/2020. (JND)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/10/2020. (MD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Artavious V. Cotton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(KKH) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt. |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Fourth Judicial Circuit, Duval County filed by Artavious V. Cotton. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (No IPF provided. Two service copies provided. Initial envelope postmarked 10/18/20 then returned to Petitioner. Second envelope postmarked 10/28/20.)(KKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
