Rowe v. Putnam Community Medical Center
Lamour Rowe |
Putnam Community Medical Center |
3:2020cv01277 |
November 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Brian J Davis |
James R Klindt |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Miles, Daniel) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Lamour Rowe. (Dickens, Thomas) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Putnam Community Medical Center. Related case(s): no (Miles, Daniel) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Putnam Community Medical Center. (Miles, Daniel) |
Filing 9 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #8 Amended Complaint by Putnam Community Medical Center.(Jaensch, Tracey) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Putnam Community Medical Center with Jury Demand. filed by Lamour Rowe. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Lamour Rowe.(Dickens, Thomas) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint and Supporting Memorandum. Defendant shall have up to and including 12/21/2020 to file a response to the Complaint (Doc. No. 1). Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt on 12/15/2020. (MDC) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Putnam Community Medical Center. (Miles, Daniel) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt. |
Filing 5 RETURN of service as to Putnam Community Medical Center executed on 11/23/2020 by Lamour Rowe (Dickens, Thomas) Modified docket text on 12/3/2020 (KEM). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/18/2020. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Report Form, #2 Consent Letter and Form)(CKS) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Putnam Community Medical Center. (KEM) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Brian J. Davis and Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt. New case number: 3:20-cv-1277-J-39JRK. (LRB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Putnam Community Medical Center with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17537956) filed by Lamour Rowe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons)(Dickens, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rowe v. Putnam Community Medical Center | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lamour Rowe | |
Represented By: | Thomas L. Dickens |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Putnam Community Medical Center | |
Represented By: | Tracey K. Jaensch |
Represented By: | Daniel Kent Miles |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.