AGCS Marine Insurance Company et al v. Amerisure Insurance Company
| AGCS Marine Insurance Company, XL Specialty Insurance Company and Hal Jones Contractor, Inc. |
| Amerisure Insurance Company |
| 3:2020cv01293 |
| November 16, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Monte C Richardson |
| Harvey E Schlesinger |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jack T. Frost on behalf of Amerisure Insurance Company (Frost, Jack) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by AGCS Marine Insurance Company, XL Specialty Insurance Company. (Kallen, John) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER of service returned executed on 12/10/2020 by AGCS Marine Insurance Company, XL Specialty Insurance Company as to Amerisure Insurance Company. (Kallen, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 2 (MGG) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger and Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. New case number: 3:20-cv-1293-J-20MCR. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AGCS Marine Insurance Co et al against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17552802) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Release, #2 Exhibit Assignment, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kallen, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.