Ullrich et al v. Ullrich
Stephen Ullrich, Monica Ullrich and Peter David Ullrich |
Clarisse Ullrich |
3:2021cv00147 |
February 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Patricia D Barksdale |
Timothy J Corrigan |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. § 0001 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Case Management Report by Clarisse Ullrich. (Thomas, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. |
Filing 20 SUR-REPLY to #19 Reply to Opposition to Motion to Remand filed by Clarisse Ullrich. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Busey, Stephen) Modified to edit text on 4/6/2021 (KKH). |
Filing 19 REPLY to #16 Response to Motion re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Monica Ullrich, Peter David Ullrich, Stephen Ullrich. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Liles, Rutledge) Modified to edit text and create docket entry relationship on 3/30/2021 (KKH). |
Filing 18 ENDORSED ORDER granting #17 Petitioners' Motion for Leave to File a Reply to Respondent's Opposition to Motion to Remand. Petitioners shall file a reply of no more than five pages no later than 3/29/2021. Respondent may file a sur-reply of no more than five pages no later than 4/5/2021. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 3/22/2021. (TLN) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to File a Reply to Respondent's #16 Response in Opposition to Petitioners' Motion to Remand by Monica Ullrich, Peter David Ullrich, Stephen Ullrich. (Liles, Rutledge) Modified to edit text and create docket entry relationship on 3/19/2021 (KKH). |
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Clarisse Ullrich. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8)(Busey, Stephen) |
Filing 15 REQUEST for oral argument re #14 Response in Opposition to Motion by Monica Ullrich, Peter David Ullrich, Stephen Ullrich. (Liles, Rutledge) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Stay Action and to Compel Arbitration filed by Monica Ullrich, Peter David Ullrich, Stephen Ullrich. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Liles, Rutledge) |
Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 the parties' joint motion for an extension of time to respond to #6 the motion to stay the action and compel arbitration and #10 the amended motion to remand. The petitioners must respond to the motion to stay and compel arbitration by March 11, 2021. The respondent must respond to the amended motion to remand by March 15, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on 3/8/2021. (KNR) |
Filing 12 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responses re #6 Motion for Remand and Respondent's Motion to Stay Action and Compel Arbitration by Monica Ullrich, Peter David Ullrich, Stephen Ullrich. (Patricoff, Harold) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. (Modified on 3/8/2021 edit docket relationship) (JDR). |
Filing 11 REQUEST for oral argument re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Monica Ullrich, Peter David Ullrich, Stephen Ullrich. (Liles, Rutledge) |
Filing 10 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court by Monica Ullrich, Peter David Ullrich, Stephen Ullrich. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Liles, Rutledge) Modified to edit text on 2/26/2021 (KKH). |
Filing 9 REQUEST for oral argument re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Monica Ullrich, Peter David Ullrich, Stephen Ullrich. (Liles, Rutledge) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Monica Ullrich, Peter David Ullrich, Stephen Ullrich. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Liles, Rutledge) |
Filing 7 REQUEST for oral argument re #6 MOTION to Stay Action and to Compel Arbitration by Clarisse Ullrich. (Thomas, John) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Stay Action and to Compel Arbitration by Clarisse Ullrich. (Busey, Stephen) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to counsel Kevin P. Blodgett of Local Rule 2.01(a), which requires membership or special admission in the Middle District bar to practice in the Middle District, except for the limited exceptions identified in the Rule. To apply for membership in the Middle District, visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KKH) |
Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Timothy J. Corrigan and Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 3:21-cv-0147-TJC-PDB. (SJB) |
Filing 5 Verified PETITION for Declaratory and Other Relief against Clarisse Ullrich with Jury Demand, originally filed in the Fourth Judicial Circuit, Nassau County on 11/24/2020, case number 16-255-CP filed by Peter David Ullrich, Stephen Ullrich, Monica Ullrich.(KKH) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Clarisse Ullrich. (Thomas, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court, Fourth Judicial Circuit, Nassau County, Florida, case number 2016-255-CP filed in State Court on 11/24/2020. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 113A-17885833 filed by Clarisse Ullrich. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Exhibit 1 - Verified Petition for Declaratory and Other Relief, #2 Exhibit 2 Part 1, #3 Exhibit 2 Part 2, #4 Exhibit 2 Part 3, #5 Exhibit 2 Part 4, #6 Exhibit 2 Part 5, #7 Exhibit 2 Part 6, #8 Exhibit 2 Part 7, #9 Exhibit 2 Part 8, #10 Exhibit 2 Par 9, #11 Exhibit 3, #12 Exhibit 4, #13 State Court Other Documents Exhibit 5, #14 State Court Docket Sheet, #15 Civil Cover Sheet)(Busey, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.