Diehl v. Bailey et al
Plaintiff: David Andrew Diehl
Defendant: Sean M. Mullen, Jake Bailey and Scott Jensen
Case Number: 3:2021cv00359
Filed: April 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Patricia D Barksdale
Referring Judge: Marcia Morales Howard
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying #8 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis and assessing the total $505 appellate filing fee; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 5/27/2021. (CAW)
May 26, 2021 Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to USCA consisting of copies of notice of appeal, docket sheet, order/judgment being appealed, and motion, if applicable to USCA re #7 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: #1 Notice of appeal, #2 Order, #3 Judgment)(SJW)
May 24, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by David Andrew Diehl. (SJW)
May 24, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Order dismissing case, #4 Judgment by David Andrew Diehl. Filing fee not paid. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SJW)
May 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying #5 Motion for Reconsideration / Clarification. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 5/18/2021. (ACT)
April 28, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration by David Andrew Diehl. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(BGR)
April 13, 2021 Filing 4 JUDGMENT entered dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 4/13/2021. (BGR)
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER dismissing case with prejudice, with instructions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 4/12/2021. (ACT)
April 1, 2021 Filing 2 PRISONER consent form and financial certificate by David Andrew Diehl. (KKH)
April 1, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jake Bailey, Scott Jensen, Sean M. Mullen filed by David Andrew Diehl. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attachment A, #2 Mailing Envelope) (No IFP provided. No service copies provided.)(KKH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diehl v. Bailey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sean M. Mullen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jake Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Jensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Andrew Diehl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?