McDonald v. Professional Debt Mediation, Inc.
Vanessa R. McDonald |
Professional Debt Mediation, Inc. |
3:2021cv00748 |
July 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Patricia D Barksdale |
Brian J Davis |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 the defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to #1 the complaint. The defendant must respond to the complaint by October 12, 2021. For future filings, counsel must comply with Local Rule 3.01(f), which provides, "Unless otherwise permitted by these rules, no party may submit a proposed judgment or other order without leave." Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on 9/10/2021. (BHC) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File response to complaint by Professional Debt Mediation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Perry, Erin) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin Perry on behalf of Professional Debt Mediation, Inc. (Perry, Erin) |
Filing 5 RETURN of service executed on 8/20/2021 by Vanessa R. McDonald as to Professional Debt Mediation, Inc.. (Taylor, Alexander) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CKS) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Professional Debt Mediation, Inc. (AEP) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Brian J. Davis and Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 3:21-cv-0748-BJD-PDB. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Professional Debt Mediation, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18528893) filed by Vanessa R. McDonald. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Taylor, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McDonald v. Professional Debt Mediation, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Vanessa R. McDonald | |
Represented By: | Alexander J. Taylor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Professional Debt Mediation, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Erin Perry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.