American States Insurance Company v. Ace American Insurance Company
| American States Insurance Company |
| Ace American Insurance Company |
| 3:2021cv00756 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Patricia D Barksdale |
| Brian J Davis |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 the defendant's unopposed motion to extend the time to respond to the complaint. The defendant must respond to the complaint by October 12, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on 9/23/2021. (BHC)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Ace American Insurance Company. (Rapp, Stephen) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. |
| Filing 5 PROOF of service by American States Insurance Company (Leichtling, Adam) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CKS) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Ace American Insurance Company. (AEP) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Brian J. Davis and Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 3:21-cv-0756-BJD-PDB. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT against Ace American Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18533884) filed by American States Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - ACE American Insurance Policy, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - American States Ins. Co. Policy, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Initial Disclosure Statement, #5 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons)(Leichtling, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: American States Insurance Company v. Ace American Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: American States Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Adam B. Leichtling |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Rudge Rosenn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ace American Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Stephen J. Rapp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
