Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC v. Amerisure Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC
Defendant: Amerisure Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2021cv00962
Filed: September 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Patricia D Barksdale
Referring Judge: Timothy J Corrigan
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC by Amerisure Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Huston, Gerald)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #15 the motion to strike and for sanctions. The motion is granted to the extent the Court directs Amerisure to file an amended pleading omitting the allegations about Rayonier's report and fixing the paragraph numbering by December 3, 2021. The motion is otherwise denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on 11/19/2021. (BHC)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Renstrom, Laura)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Beard Renstrom on behalf of Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC (Renstrom, Laura)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 Unopposed MOTION to Strike #7 Answer to ComplaintCounterclaim Certain Paragraphs MOTION for Sanctions filed by Amerisure Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Huston, Gerald)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ENDORSED ORDER granting #13 Defendant Amerisure Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion to File Second Supplemental Certificate of Interested Parties. Defendant's Supplemental Certificate of Interested Parties may remain as an exhibit and need not be refiled. Based on the supplement, the Court is satisfied that it has jurisdiction over the case. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 11/1/2021. (CKM)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION to Strike Certain Paragraphs of Defendant's Counterclaim re #7 Answer to Complaint Counterclaim and Opposed MOTION for Sanctions by Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Page, Frederick) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. (Modified on 10/25/2021 to edit docket text) (JDR).
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER to #7 Counterclaim by Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC. Related document: #7 Answer to Complaint Counterclaim filed by Amerisure Insurance Company.(Page, Frederick) (Modified on 10/25/2021 to edit docket text) (JDR).
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION to File Second Supplemental Certificate of Interested Parties by Amerisure Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Huston, Gerald) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. (Modified on 10/22/2021 to edit docket text) (JDR).
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 the defendant's motion to substitute an exhibit to its answer and directing the Clerk of Court to remove current docket number 7-1 from CM/ECF and replace it with current document number 10-1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on 10/20/2021. (ASL)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #8 Order by Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC. (Page, Frederick)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Substitute Exhibit 1 to Amerisure's Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Courterclaim to Plaintiff's Complaint by Amerisure Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Huston, Gerald) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. (Modified on 10/15/2021 to edit docket text) (JDR).
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Amerisure Insurance Company. (Huston, Gerald)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER directing defendant to file a certificate of interested parties or some other supplemental filing no later than 10/14/2021. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 10/4/2021. (MD)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ANSWER to #4 Complaint for Declaratory Relief Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim against All Plaintiffs by Amerisure Insurance Company. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Huston, Gerald) (Modified on 10/4/2021 to edit docket text and relationship) (JDR). (Modified on 10/21/2021 per #12 Order remove 7-1 and replaced with (6) Exhibit) (JDR).
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE by Amerisure Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 State Court Docket Sheet)(Huston, Gerald)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE to counsel Gerald Huston of Local Rule 1.06(b), which requires a legible copy of each paper docketed in the state court. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JDR)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Amerisure Insurance Company with Jury Demand filed by Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Originally filed in State Court on 09/02/2021)(JDR)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MD)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Timothy J. Corrigan and Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 3:21-cv-962-TJC-PDB. (LMW)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fourth Judicial Circuit in and for Nassau County, Florida, case number 21 CA 263 filed in State Court on September 7, 2021. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AFLMDC-18752579 filed by Amerisure Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Supplement Certificate of Interested Persons)(Huston, Gerald)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC v. Amerisure Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC
Represented By: Frederick Dyer Page
Represented By: Laura Beard Renstrom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amerisure Insurance Company
Represented By: Gerald Huston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?