Verner v. Commissioner of Social Security
Tequilla Verner |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
3:2021cv01019 |
October 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Patricia D Barksdale |
Marcia Morales Howard |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Proof of Service by Tequilla Verner (Attachments: #1 Appendix Proof of service, #2 Appendix Proof of service, #3 Appendix Proof of service)(Gibney, L.) (Modified on 10/26/2021, to edit text) (BGR). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Nadine Elder on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Elder, Nadine) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BGR) |
Filing 3 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/10. (BGR) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Marcia Morales Howard and Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 3:21-cv-1019-MMH-PDB. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18802886) filed by Tequilla Verner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Appeals Council, #3 Proposed Summons)(Gibney, L.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.