Ingles v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
| Adam Ingles |
| Secretary Department of Corrections, Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections |
| 3:2021cv01021 |
| October 12, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Henry Lee Adams |
| Joel B Toomey |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER discharging #3 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel B. Toomey on 12/8/2021. (CAW)
|
| FEES paid by Adam Ingles (Filing fee $5.00 receipt number JAX035350) (KEM) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for Petitioner's failure to comply with the Court's Order as well as lack of prosecution; Show Cause Response and filing fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis due by 1/5/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel B. Toomey on 12/1/2021. (CAW)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing Petitioner to pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis by 11/17/2021; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel B. Toomey on 10/13/2021. (CAW)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Adam Ingles. (Attachment: #1 Mailing Envelope)(KEM)(2 services copies provided, no IFP or payment received) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
