Moss v. Inch et al
JATOON MOSS |
MARK INCH, WILLIAM JEFFREY JERRELS, JOHN NETTLES, JACOB ANDERSON, DANIEL KLEIN, ROBERT E. SMITH, JR., JASON LIVINGSTON, JOHN NYITRAY, AARON LEWIS, JON EBERLEIN, STEVEN POTOSKY, DANIEL GREENE, ROY HARDEN, ROYCE GIVENS, RICHARD FLYNN, LONNIE UNDERWOOD, AMANDA COREY, STEPHANIE WINNINGHAM, JEAN DURE and John E. Nettles |
3:2021cv01026 |
October 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Marcia Morales Howard |
Monte C Richardson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CASE Reassigned to Judge Marcia Morales Howard. New case number: 3:21-cv-1026-MMH. Judge Timothy J. Corrigan no longer assigned to the case. (LRB) |
Filing 3 ENDORSED ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.07(a)(2)(A), this case is transferred to the Honorable Marcia Morales Howard, United States District Judge, with her consent. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 10/14/2021. (JLD) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Timothy J. Corrigan and Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. New case number: 3:21-cv-1026-TJC-MCR. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18806830) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Civil Cover Sheet)(Cook, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.