Carlisle v. Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC
| James Carlisle |
| Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC |
| 3:2021cv01035 |
| October 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Patricia D Barksdale |
| Harvey E Schlesinger |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by James Carlisle. (Kim, Young) |
Filing 7
ORDER to show cause within fourteen days from the date of this Order why this case should not be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to file a joint Case Management Report. Signed by Senior Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger on 12/10/2021. (TPL)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by James Carlisle. Related case(s): No (Kim, Young) |
| Filing 5 RULE 3.03 Disclosure Statement by Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC. (Spengler, Sangeeta) Modified on 10/22/2021 to edit docket text per Chambers (KEM). |
| Filing 4 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC.(Spengler, Sangeeta) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (TPL) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger and Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 3:21-cv-1035-HES-PDB. (LMW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court in and for Flagler County, case number 2021-SC-001068 filed in State Court on 09/09/2021. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AFLMDC-18816328 filed by Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Supplement State Court Summons, #4 State Court COMPLAINT, #5 Supplement State Court Notice of Removal)(Golden, Dale) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carlisle v. Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Carlisle | |
| Represented By: | Young Vincent Kim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Dale Thomas Golden |
| Represented By: | Sangeeta P. Spengler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
