Criner v. Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections
Takoya Criner and Takoya Dominic Criner |
Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections and Florida Attorney General |
3:2021cv01160 |
November 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Timothy J Corrigan |
Laura Lothman Lambert |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 AMENDED PETITION by a State prisoner for writ of habeas corpus filed by Takoya Dominic Criner.(JDR) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 petitioner's motion to amend his petition; directions to the clerk. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laura Lothman Lambert on 12/17/2021. (CAW) |
Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Takoya Dominic Criner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Habeas Petition)(Hamrick, Joseph) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Laura Lothman Lambert. |
Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Timothy J. Corrigan and Magistrate Judge Laura Lothman Lambert. New case number: 3:21-cv-1160-TJC-LLL. (SJB) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Takoya Criner OF INTENT TO FILE AMENDED HABEAS PETITION (Hamrick, Joseph) |
Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLMDC-18951254) filed by Takoya Criner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hamrick, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.