McEachern et al v. E.R.J. Insurance Group et al
John Nelson Patrick McEachern and Blue Dealer Services, Inc. |
ERJ Insurance Group, American Heritage Insurance Services, Pablo Creek Services, Incv,, E.R.J. Insurance Group, Inc. doing business as American Heritage Insurance Services and Pablo Creek Services, Inc. |
3:2022cv00023 |
January 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Brian J Davis |
Monte C Richardson |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Dismiss Duplicate Proceeding or Alternative Motion to Stay or Abate This Case filed by Blue Dealer Services, Inc., John Nelson Patrick McEachern. (Kent, William) |
Filing 13 CASE Reassigned to Judge Brian J. Davis. New case number: 3:22-cv-23-BJD-MCR. Judge Timothy J. Corrigan no longer assigned to the case. (LRB) |
![]() |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Duplicate Proceeding or Alternative MOTION to Stay or Abate This Case by E.R.J. Insurance Group, Inc., Pablo Creek Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and Dismiss Complaint)(Carey, Brett) (Modified on 2/10/2022, to edit text) (BGR). |
![]() |
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Dione C. Greene to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-19181001 for $150 by Blue Dealer Services, Inc., John Nelson Patrick McEachern. (Kent, William) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. |
![]() |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award by E.R.J. Insurance Group, Inc., Pablo Creek Services, Inc.. (Carey, Brett) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. |
Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by E.R.J. Insurance Group, Inc., Pablo Creek Services, Inc.. Related case(s): Yes (Carey, Brett) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Brett Carey on behalf of E.R.J. Insurance Group, Inc., Pablo Creek Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Service E-Mail)(Carey, Brett) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to counsel Dione C. Greene Local Rule 2.01(c), Special Admission of Non-Resident Lawyer - File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Co-counsel with filing rights may electronically file the motion on behalf of the non-resident lawyer or the motion may be filed on paper; (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (AEP) |
Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Timothy J. Corrigan and Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. New case number: 3:22-cv-0023-TJC-MCR. Motion(s) REFERRED: #1 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. (SJB) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in support re #1 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award filed by Blue Dealer Services, Inc., John Nelson Patrick McEachern. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, McEachern Notarized Affidavit, #2 Exhibit 2, ERJ Agreement, #3 Exhibit 3, Pablo Creek Services Agreement, #4 Exhibit 4, Arbitration Demand, #5 Exhibit 5, Prior Arbitration Excerpts, #6 Exhibit 6, Letters, #7 Exhibit 7, Allstate emails re Arbitrationn, #8 Exhibit 8, Motion and Memo, #9 Exhibit 9, MSE Dist. v. Southwest Reinsure, #10 Exhibit 10, Final Arbitration Award, #11 Exhibit 11, Email re Separate Action, #12 Exhibit 12, Index of Exhibits for Motion to Confirm)(Kent, William) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award by All Plaintiffs. (Kent, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.