Shepard v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
Adam Lloyd Shepard |
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General |
3:2022cv00188 |
February 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Henry Lee Adams |
Patricia D Barksdale |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER staying the case; directing the Clerk to administratively close the case; Petitioner shall move to reopen upon exhaustion. Signed by Senior Judge Henry Lee Adams, Jr on 2/22/2022. (CAW) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Adam Lloyd Shepard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Deposition of Dr. Ronald Wright)(Ufferman, Michael) |
Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge Henry Lee Adams, Jr and Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 3:22-cv-00188-HLA-PDB. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to File Excess Pages . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. (APV) |
Filing 2 MOTION to File Excess Pages by ADAM LLOYD SHEPARD. (Ufferman, Michael) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLMDC-19249959) filed by ADAM LLOYD SHEPARD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ufferman, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.