D'Alessandro, III v. Lane et al
| Joseph L. D'Alessandro and Joseph L. D'Alessandro, III |
| Christopher Lane, Damauro, Moore, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, C. Smart, Sarah A. Chao and Robin N. Eddins |
| 3:2022cv00304 |
| March 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Marcia Morales Howard |
| Joel B Toomey |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT that pursuant to this Court's Order, entered March 24, 2022 is hereby entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 3/24/2022. (RH) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 3/24/2022. (CAW)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Joseph L. D'Alessandro, III. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Account Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope)(BGR) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joel B. Toomey. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sarah A. Chao, Damauro, Robin N. Eddins, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, Christopher Lane, Moore, C. Smart filed by Joseph L. D'Alessandro, III. (No service copies received) (BGR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
