Cogdell v. Williams et al
| Carlos Cogdell |
| Williams and Ween |
| 3:2022cv01013 |
| September 20, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Brian J Davis |
| Monte C Richardson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to USCA consisting of copies of notice of appeal, order/judgment being appealed, and motion, if applicable to USCA re #5 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: #1 Notice of appeal, #2 Order, #3 Judgment)(SJW) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Order, #4 Judgment by Carlos Cogdell. Filing fee not paid. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SJW) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/14/2022. (BGR) |
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing the case without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 10/13/2022. (KLC)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Application to proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) by Carlos Cogdell. (JDR) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ween, Williams filed by Carlos Cogdell. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (No service copies)(JDR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
