Depaco v. Cofina Media, SA et al
| CAESAR DEPACO |
| COFINA MEDIA, SA, REVISTA SABADO, ALEXANDRE JOSE RIBEIRO MALHADO, EDUARDO DEMASO, JOHN DOES 1 through 10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1 through 10 |
| 3:2022cv01392 |
| December 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Brian J Davis |
| Monte C Richardson |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 Unopposed Motion for Admission of Peter W. Gabra to Appear Pro Hac Vice and Designation and Consent to Act. If Peter W. Gabra, Esq. has not already done so, he shall immediately register for a login and password for electronic filing at the Court's website at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 1/5/2023. (MDH)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Peter W. Gabra to appear pro hac vice by Caesar Depaco. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Special Admission Attorney Certification)(Ticktin, Peter) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. |
| Filing 7 CORRECTED COMPLAINT for Damages, Injunctive Relief, and Demand for Trial by Jury against Cofina Media, SA, Eduardo Demaso, Revista Sabado, Alexandre Jose Ribeiro Malhado filed by All Plaintiffs.(Ticktin, Peter) (Modified on 1/4/2023 to edit docket text) (JDR). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying without prejudice #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Compliance due January 4, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 12/21/2022. (MDH)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER STRIKING #1 Complaint. On or before January 4, 2023, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint or this case will be dismissed without prejudice. See order for details. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 12/20/2022. (AMP)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Peter W. Gabra to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-20325751 for $150 by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certification of Peter Gabra, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Ticktin, Peter) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CKS) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Brian J. Davis and Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. New case number: 3:22-cv-1392-BJD-MCR. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 STRIKEN per #5 Order; COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20316124) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons)(Ticktin, Peter) (Modified on 12/21/2022 to edit docket text) (JDR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
