Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Christopher Sanchez
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 3:2022cv01422
Filed: December 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Brian J Davis
Referring Judge: Monte C Richardson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Commissioner of Social Security answer or response due 3/23/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 2/16/2023. (MDH)
February 15, 2023 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John)
February 15, 2023 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson.
January 13, 2023 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Christopher Sanchez. (Zadel, Bartholomew)
January 13, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Christopher Sanchez. Related case(s): Yes (Zadel, Bartholomew)
December 23, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE: Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) became effective on December 1, 2022. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules also apply to this proceeding except to the extent they are inconsistent with the supplemental rules. The Standing Order on Management of Social Security Cases entered on December 7, 2021, no longer applies. The parties must review the supplemental rules to determine the governing deadlines, including the deadline to file the plaintiff's brief, the Commissioner's brief, and the plaintiff's reply brief. (JDR)
December 22, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Brian J. Davis and Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. New case number: 3:22-cv-1422-BJD-MCR. (SJB)
December 22, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20336753) filed by Christopher Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zadel, Bartholomew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Sanchez
Represented By: Bartholomew Charles Zadel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Nadine DeLuca Elder
Represented By: John F. Rudy, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?