Gross v. Geico Indemnity Company
| Kenneth Gross |
| Geico Indemnity Company |
| 3:2023cv00632 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Timothy J Corrigan |
| Laura Lothman Lambert |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER remanding case to Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit, in and for St. Johns County, Florida; directing clerk to close the file. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 6/9/2023. (RMV)
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE re #6 Order by Geico Indemnity Company. (McCoy, Michael) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing Defendant to supplement #1 the Notice of Removal no later than 6/14/2023. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 6/8/2023. (RMV)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #4 Complaint with Jury Demand by Geico Indemnity Company.(McCoy, Michael) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Geico Indemnity Company with Jury Demand filed by Kenneth Gross. (Filed in State Court on 03/19/2023)(AET) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (AMM) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Timothy J. Corrigan and Magistrate Judge Laura Lothman Lambert. New case number: 3:23-cv-632-TJC-LLL. (AET) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court, case number CA23-0459 filed in State Court on 03/19/2023. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-20877199 filed by Geico Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit Voter Registration, #4 Exhibit Corporate Information, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(McCoy, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gross v. Geico Indemnity Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kenneth Gross | |
| Represented By: | Steven E. Earle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Geico Indemnity Company | |
| Represented By: | Michael David McCoy |
| Represented By: | Ashley Michelle Fields |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
