Riley v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
| Latoya Riley |
| CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSX) and CSX Transporation, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00960 |
| August 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Marcia Morales Howard |
| Laura Lothman Lambert |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #6 Amended Complaint by CSX Transporation, Inc..(Brice, Thomas) |
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER granting #10, Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Supporting Memorandum of Law. Defendant shall respond to the amended complaint #6 on or before October 13, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laura Lothman Lambert on 10/4/2023. (REL)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 Amended Complaint by CSX Transporation, Inc.. (Brice, Thomas) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Laura Lothman Lambert. |
| Filing 9 PROOF of service by Latoya Riley (Poindexter, James) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by James C. Poindexter on behalf of Latoya Riley. Lead Counsel: James C. Poindexter. (Poindexter, James) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE to counsel of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LD) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against CSX Transporation, Inc. with Jury Demand filed by Latoya Riley. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Latoya Riley.(Poindexter, James) Modified on 8/31/2023 (LD). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER striking #1 Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a corrected complaint consistent with the directives of this Order on or before September 1, 2023. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 8/17/2023. (MHM)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to CSX Transporation, Inc. (LD) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JW) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Marcia Morales Howard and Magistrate Judge Laura Lothman Lambert. New case number: 3:23-cv-960-MMH-LLL. (ARC) |
| Filing 1 ***STRICKEN PURSUANT TO #5 ORDER***COMPLAINT against CSX Transportation, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number BFLMDC-21150902) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet , #2 Proposed Summons )(Poindexter, James) Modified on 8/16/2023 to remove duplicate text. (LD). Modified on 8/18/2023 (LSS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
