Thomas v. Credence Resource Management, LLC et al
| Tarsheika Thomas |
| Credence Resource Management, LLC and Resurgent Capital Services L.P. |
| 3:2023cv01110 |
| September 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Marcia Morales Howard |
| Monte C Richardson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 10/20/2023. (HW)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Tarsheika Thomas. (BD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall file a notarized application on or before October 20, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 10/4/2023. (HW)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Tarsheika Thomas. (ELM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Credence Resource Management, LLC, Resurgent Capital Services L.P. with Jury Demand filed by Tarsheika Thomas. (Filed at counter. No services copies provided.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ELM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
