Hatcher v. Cardenas et al
| Mark Eugene Hatcher |
| Daniel William Cardenas, Mark R. Ambrose, Jr. and Lisa Haskins Carter |
| 3:2024cv00076 |
| January 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Laura Lothman Lambert |
| Harvey E Schlesinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT dismissing this case without prejudice (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (ARL) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Senior Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger on 3/13/2024. (CAW)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mark Eugene Hatcher. (BD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Laura Lothman Lambert. |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Mark R. Ambrose, Jr., Daniel William Cardenas, Lisa Haskins Carter filed by Mark Eugene Hatcher. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (No service copies) (BD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Mark Eugene Hatcher. (BGR) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Laura Lothman Lambert. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark R. Ambrose, Jr., Daniel William Cardenas, Lisa Haskins Carter filed by Mark Eugene Hatcher. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (No service copies received) (BGR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
