ROSEMARY v. BESTBET HOLDINGS, INC.
QUINN ROSEMARY |
BESTBET HOLDINGS, INC. |
3:2024cv00473 |
May 10, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against BESTBET HOLDINGS, INC. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-22081134) filed by QUINN ROSEMARY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION)(Blye, Tanesha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ROSEMARY v. BESTBET HOLDINGS, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: QUINN ROSEMARY | |
Represented By: | Tanesha Walls Blye |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BESTBET HOLDINGS, INC. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.