Wells v. Palmer et al
| William Edward Wells, III |
| John Palmer, Barry Reddish, Kevin Tomlinson, Richard Andrews, Michelle Nipper and Ricky Dixon |
| 3:2024cv00532 |
| May 24, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Patricia D Barksdale |
| Timothy J Corrigan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, assessing the initial partial filing fee of $87, and the total filing fee of $350; directions to the clerk. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on 5/29/2024. (CAW)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to pro se litigant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on 5/29/2024. (CAW) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by William Edward Wells, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Trust fund account statement, #2 Mailing Envelope)(ELM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Richard Andrews, Ricky Dixon, Michelle Nipper, John Palmer, Barry Reddish, Kevin Tomlinson with Jury Demand filed by William Edward Wells, III. (No service copies provided.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Mailing Envelope)(ELM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
