Doe v. G4 Property Owner LLC et al
| Jane Doe |
| G4 Property Owner LLC formerly known as Generation Properties doing business as Motel 6, Generation Properties, Peak Properties,Inc doing business as America's Best Inn Jacksonville and Guru Krupa Charmi, LLC doing business as America's Best Inn Jacksonville |
| 3:2025cv00318 |
| March 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Wendy W Berger |
| Monte C Richardson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDERED that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE on or before September 22, 2025, why the Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to serve. Failure to respond to this Order may result in dismissal of this case without further notice from the Court. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 9/11/2025. (CKS)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CKS) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective April 1, 2024, and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. Additionally, the undersigned has issued Standing Orders, available at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/judges/wendy-berger, that apply to all proceedings before the undersigned. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules and this Court's Standing Orders. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 4/1/2025. (CKS)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Scharome Rayanne Wolfe of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MLB) |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. New case number: 3:25-cv-00318-WWB-MCR. (JOS) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT Filed against Jane Rayanne Doe with Jury Demand filed by Jane Rayanne Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wolfe, Scharome) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jane Rayanne Doe with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-23163553) filed by Jane Rayanne Doe.(Wolfe, Scharome) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
