Walters v. State of Arizona
Plaintiff: Bryan Walters
Defendant: State of Arizona
Case Number: 3:2025cv00395
Filed: April 11, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Samuel J Horovitz
Referring Judge: Marcia Morales Howard
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER denying #22 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 7/23/2025. (JW)
June 23, 2025 Filing 22 MOTION for Reconsideration re #17 Order Dismissing Case by Bryan Walters (e-portal). (BD)
June 23, 2025 Filing 21 SUPPLEMENTAL Pleading by Bryan Walters (e-portal). (BD)
June 16, 2025 Filing 20 SUPPLEMENTAL Pleading by Bryan Walters. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (e-portal)(MDC)
June 12, 2025 Filing 19 JUDGMENT dismissing this case without prejudice ( Signed by Deputy Clerk) (ARL)
June 12, 2025 Filing 18 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ARL)
June 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close the file. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 6/11/2025. (JW)
May 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing on or before June 2, 2025, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to diligently prosecute this action and failure to comply with the #8 Court's Order dated April 15, 2025. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz on 5/19/2025. (KTQ)
May 7, 2025 Filing 15 SUPPLEMENT PLEADING re #1 Complaint by Bryan Walters (e-portal). (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1 - 6)(BD)
April 24, 2025 Filing 14 SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING re #1 Complaint by Bryan Walters (e-portal). (BD)
April 17, 2025 Filing 13 3rd SUPPLEMENT Pleading by Bryan Walters. (e-portal) (JDR)
April 17, 2025 Filing 12 SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING re: #1 Complaint by Bryan Walters (e-portal). (BD)
April 16, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #10 Motion to Compel Court Ordered Discovery to Court in favor of the plaintiff ("Motion"). The Court has not ordered any discovery to compel. In addition, the Motion does not comply with Local Rule 3.01. All motions filed with the Court must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court, including the requirements of Local Rule 3.01. Signed by Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz on 4/16/2025. (KTQ)
April 15, 2025 Filing 10 MOTION to Compel Court Ordered Discovery by Bryan Walters (e-portal). (BD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz.
April 15, 2025 Filing 9 MOTION for CMC Hearing by Bryan Walters (e-portal). (BD) Modified event type on 4/16/2025 (JKB).
April 15, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to forward this Order and the attached Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) ("Application") to Plaintiff. On or before May 6, 2025, Plaintiff shall either submit the $405.00 filing fee or, if appropriate, separately complete and file the Application attached to this Order. Any Application must be properly sworn by Plaintiff with a handwritten signature. Failure to do so may result in this matter being dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz on 4/15/2025. (Attachments: #1 AO 239) (KTQ)
April 15, 2025 Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING re #1 Complaint by Bryan Walters (e-portal). (BD)
April 14, 2025 Filing 6 MOTION for Court Service to Defendant by Bryan Walters (e-portal). (BD)
April 14, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE of Clarification by Bryan Walters (e-portal) re #3 PETITION for Review of State Court Dismissals (BD)
April 14, 2025 Filing 4 PETITION for Court Appointed Private Investigator's Discovery by Bryan Walters (e-portal). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(BD)
April 14, 2025 Filing 3 PETITION for Review of State Court Dismissals by Bryan Walters (e-portal). (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Case Law)(BD)
April 11, 2025 Filing 2 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by Bryan Walters (e-portal) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(BD)
April 11, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of Arizona with Jury Demand filed by Bryan Walters (e-portal). (Attachments: #1 Copy of Order from Supreme Court of Arizona, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (No IFP) (BD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walters v. State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bryan Walters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?