Wilson v. Jones et al
| Harry Lee Wilson |
| CEO Todd Jones, Publix Owned Employee Corporation, Attorney Richard E. Ramsey, CEO Laurie Wenyon and CEO Colby Toops |
| 3:2025cv00476 |
| April 30, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Patricia D Barksdale |
| Marcia Morales Howard |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER referring motion for report and recommendation: #14 Defendant Publix Super Markets, Inc.'s Amended Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 10/23/2025. (JW) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale.
|
| Filing 21 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Arpen, Catherine) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of compliance with Initial Disclosures by Publix Owned Employee Corporation (Arpen, Catherine) |
Filing 19
ORDER directing the clerk to remove from the docket 18 the discovery-related document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on 9/2/2025. (KG)
|
| Filing 18 REMOVED PER #19 ORDER. NOTICE of compliance with Initial Disclosures by Publix Owned Employee Corporation (Arpen, Catherine) Modified docket text on 9/2/2025 (JOS). |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JW) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Amend Complaint a Civil Case why this Case should not be Dismissed Plaintiff Show Cause Order of the Court by Harry Lee Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint)(ELA) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. |
Filing 15
ORDER directing Plaintiff to file a response to #14 Amended Motion to Dismiss on or before September 5, 2025, and to show cause by this same date, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 8/21/2025. (JW)
|
| Filing 14 Amended MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction to add Certification Language by Publix Owned Employee Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - State Court Final Judgment)(Arpen, Catherine) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST for oral argument on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Publix Owned Employee Corporation. (Arpen, Catherine) |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Publix Owned Employee Corporation. (Arpen, Catherine) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Catherine V. Arpen on behalf of Publix Owned Employee Corporation (Arpen, Catherine) Modified text on 7/16/2025 (ABM). |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Publix Owned Employee Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - State Court Final Judgment)(Arpen, Catherine) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #8 Order filed by Harry Lee Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(ELA) |
Filing 8
ORDER. By August 5, 2025, the plaintiff must show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on July 8, 2025. (KG)
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Todd Jones, Publix Owned Employee Corporation, Richard E. Ramsey, Laurie Wenyon, Colby Toops with Jury Demand filed by Harry Lee Wilson.(ELA) |
Filing 6
ORDER directing the clerk to re-mail #4 the May 14, 2025, order and mail this order to the plaintiff and update the docket with the plaintiff's complete address. The Court sua sponte extends the deadline for filing an amended complaint to July 14, 2025. See the order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on June 18, 2025. (KG)
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 the plaintiff's application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs and staying the issuance of summonses and service of process. By June 9, 2025, the plaintiff must file an amended complaint that complies with the pleading rules and the directives in the order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on May 14, 2025. (Attachment: #1 Pro Se 1 Form) (KG)
|
| Filing 3 **DOCKETED IN ERROR** NOTICE to Plaintiff of Local Rule 1.06(b), which requires a legible copy of each paper docketed in the state court. The state court record must be attached as separate files. Refer to the Attorney Civil Case Opening Manual (www.flmd.uscourts.gov), for details on how to attach and describe the state court record (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KME) Modified text on 5/1/2025 (KME). Modified on 5/7/2025 to edit docket text - event type not a Notice of Removal per Chambers (MDC). |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Harry Lee Wilson. (ELA) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Harry Lee Wilson. (Scanned in the order received) (ELA) Modified on 5/7/2025 to edit docket text - incorrect event type used per Chambers (MDC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.