Randall v. R & B Contracting Inc. et al
| Cecil Randall, Jr. |
| R & B Contracting Inc. and Robert K. Bennett |
| 3:2025cv01156 |
| September 29, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Samuel J Horovitz |
| Marcia Morales Howard |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against Robert K. Bennett, R & B Contracting Inc. with Jury Demand. filed by Cecil Randall, Jr. Related document: #12 Amended Complaint filed by Cecil Randall, Jr. (JVC) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS issued as to Robert K. Bennett, R & B Contracting Inc. (AA) |
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's #9 second amended Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, as Plaintiff has paid the applicable filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz on 2/2/2026. (JLW)
|
| FEES Paid by Cecil Randall, Jr (Filing fee $405.00, Receipt Number 38491). (ELA) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER taking under advisement #9 pro se Plaintiff's second amended Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs ("Application"). On or before February 13, 2026, Plaintiff shall either pay the requisite $405.00 filing fee or, if appropriate, file a completed AO 239 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). On or before February 13, 2026, Plaintiff shall file a third amended complaint in compliance with this Order, the Court's prior instructions, and all applicable rules and law. Plaintiff's failure to comply with the directives in this Order may result in a recommendation that the Application be denied and that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz on 1/23/2026. (JLW)
|
| Filing 12 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Cecil Randall, Jr. Related document: #4 Amended Complaint filed by Cecil Randall, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JVC) |
|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER granting the #8 motion for extension of time. The deadline in the Court's #7 December 2, 2025, Order for Plaintiff to file a proper second amended complaint is extended until January 13, 2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz on 12/30/2025. (JLW)
|
|
Filing 10
ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice as moot the #5 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form), as Plaintiff filed a more recent application #9 that the Court will consider. Signed by Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz on 12/30/2025. (JLW)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Cecil Randall, Jr. (JDR) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz. |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time by Cecil Randall, Jr. (JDR) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz. |
|
Filing 7
ORDER taking under advisement #5 pro se Plaintiff's Amended Affidavit of Indigency ("Application"). On or before December 23, 2025, Plaintiff shall either pay the requisite $405.00 filing fee or, if appropriate, file a completed AO 239 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). On or before December 23, 2025, Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order, the Court's prior instructions, and all applicable rules and law. Plaintiff's failure to comply with the directives in this Order may result in a recommendation that the Application be denied and that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz on 12/2/2025. (JLW)
|
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice as moot the #2 Affidavit of Indigency as Plaintiff filed a more recent application #5 that the Court will consider. Signed by Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz on 10/29/2025. (JLW)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Cecil Randall, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Bank Statements)(ELA) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz. |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Robert K. Bennett, R & B Contracting Inc. filed by Cecil Randall, Jr. (2 service copies provided) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(ELA) Modified on 10/28/2025 to edit docket text (ELA). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER taking under advisement #2 pro se Plaintiff's Affidavit of Indigency, which is construed as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("Motion"). On or before October 31, 2025, Plaintiff shall either pay the requisite $405.00 filing fee or, if appropriate, file a completed AO 239 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). On or before October 31, 2025, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in compliance with this Order and all applicable rules and law. Plaintiff's failure to comply with the directives in this Order may result in a recommendation that the Motion be denied and that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz on 10/10/2025. (JLW)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Cecil Randall, Jr. (ELA) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Cecil Randall, Jr. (No service copies provided)(ELA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
