Ponder v. Willson et al
| Marquise D. Ponder |
| Officer James, Officer Kenedy, Kim Poole, Ms. Clark, Officer Jones, Officer T. Mosley, Julias Belle, K. Velletta, Sgt. Kitty Smiller, Officer Ceus, Officer C. Toriox, Sgt Willson and LT W. Willets |
| 3:2025cv01294 |
| October 28, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Wendy W Berger |
| Monte C Richardson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 TRANSFER to Orlando Division and assigned case number 6:25-cv-02111-GAP-NWH (KME) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Statement of Claim by Marquise D. Ponder (JDR) |
Filing 3
ORDERED that this case is TRANSFERRED to the Orlando Division of the MiddleDistrict of Florida for all further proceedings. The Clerk shall immediately forward the file to that Division and close this case. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 10/30/2025. (CKS)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Marquise D. Ponder. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JDR) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Marquise D. Ponder. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Mailing Envelope)(JDR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
