Alsco Inc. v. Eaze Inc.
| Alsco Inc. |
| Eaze Inc. a foreign profit corporation doing business as Green Dragon |
| 3:2026cv00339 |
| February 17, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Patricia D Barksdale |
| Timothy J Corrigan |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (FLY) |
Filing 12
ORDER dismissing this case with prejudice pursuant to #11 the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice. The Clerk should terminate all pending deadlines and close the file. Signed by Senior Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 3/6/2026. (HMS)
|
| Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Alsco Inc. and Eaze Inc. (Edgecombe, Adam) Modified on 2/27/2026 to edit the docket text (MLB). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Eaze Inc. Related case(s): No (Marcus, Lee) Modified on 2/20/2026 (TDC). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Lee W. Marcus on behalf of Eaze Inc. Lead Counsel: Lee W. Marcus. (Marcus, Lee). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Adam B. Edgecombe on behalf of Alsco Inc. Lead Counsel: Adam B. Edgecombe. (Edgecombe, Adam). |
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER granting #3 the defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time. The deadline to respond to #6 the complaint is extended to March 6, 2026. By the same day, the defendant must file a disclosure statement using the standard form on the court's website, www.flmd.uscourts.gov. See Local Rule 3.03. As information, the form for disclosure statements changed effective November 1, 2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on February 19, 2026. (JCB)
|
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Eaze Inc. filed by Alsco Inc. Filed in State Court on 1/15/2026.(LAW) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (TPL) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (WLB) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond re #1 Notice of Removal and Complaint by Eaze Inc. (Marcus, Lee) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. Modified on 2/19/2026 to edit docket text. (WLB). |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge Timothy J. Corrigan and Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 3:26-cv-00339-TJC-PDB. (JOS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Seventh Judicial Circuit, Putnam County, FL, case number 2026-ca-10 filed in State Court on 1/15/2026. Filing fee $405, receipt number AFLMDC-24479321 filed by Eaze Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court COMPLAINT Exh 1 - Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exh 2 - Return of service, #4 Exhibit Exh 3 - NV Dept Alsco, #5 Exhibit Exh 4 - Subiz Alsco, #6 Exhibit Exh 5 - DE Dept Eaze, #7 Exhibit Exh 6 - Sunbiz Eaze, #8 Exhibit Exh 7 - Eaze Ann Rep, #9 State Court Docket Sheet Exh 8 - State Docket, #10 State Court Other Documents Exh 9 - Other state docs)(Marcus, Lee) (Attachment 2 replaced on 2/19/2026 to correct page orientation) (LAW). Modified text on 2/19/2026 (LAW). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Alsco Inc. v. Eaze Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alsco Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brittany Joyce Mills |
| Represented By: | Adam B. Edgecombe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eaze Inc. a foreign profit corporation doing business as Green Dragon | |
| Represented By: | Lee W. Marcus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
