Pyle v. Mann, et al
| William D Pyle |
| Sgt Mann and Ms. Divine |
| 3:2026cv00378 |
| February 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Laura Lothman Lambert |
| Jordan Emery Pratt |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff filed a letter #1, titled "Motion to the Court," in which he alleges that prison officials have denied him his replacement tablet and gang members have robbed and threatened him. This document is not a proper complaint, does not include all the information required by the court-approved civil rights complaint form, and cannot commence a civil action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 ("A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court."); see also Local Rule 6.04(a) ("A pro se person in custody must use the standard form[.]"). Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to close this case and send Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form. Plaintiff may commence a new action by using the form. Signed by Judge Jordan Emery Pratt on 3/17/2026. (ADM)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by William D Pyle. (No service copies or IFP provided) (Chambers notified) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JVC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
