Boyles v. Li et al
| Justin Boyles |
| Dr. Xiaoyu Li, Nurse Michael Collins and Nurse Heather Chapman |
| 3:2026cv00947 |
| April 20, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jordan Emery Pratt |
| Monte C Richardson |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of change of address by Justin Boyles. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ELA) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE re #4 Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Justin Boyles. (3 service copies received) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ELA) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and assessing the $350 filing fee; directing Plaintiff to provide three copies of the #1 Complaint for service of process by 6/8/2026; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 5/8/2026. (CAW)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to pro se litigant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 5/5/2026. (CAW) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Justin Boyles. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Account Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope)(ELA) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Justin Boyles. (No service copies provided) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ELA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
