Linares-Telles v. Warden, Baker County Facility et al (Baker County)
| Roberto Carlos Linares-Telles |
| Warden, Baker County Facility and U.S. Attorney General |
| 3:2026cv00993 |
| April 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jordan Emery Pratt |
| Monte C Richardson |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by U.S. Attorney General.(Branch, Katherine) |
| Filing 5 PROOF of service - Attorney General US served on 5/8/2026. (CTR) |
| Filing 4 PROOF of service - Enforcement and Removal Operations served on 5/4/2026. (CTR) |
| Filing 3 PROOF of service - Sheriff Scotty Rhoden served on 5/4/2026. (CTR) |
Filing 2
ORDER to respond and show cause why the petition should not be granted. The Clerk is directed to serve the petition. Response to petition due by 5/29/2026. The Petitioner has 30 days to reply to the response to petition. Signed by Judge Jordan Emery Pratt on 4/29/2026. (CAW)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number 38811) filed by Roberto Carlos Linares-Telles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Memorandum of Law, #3 Proof of Service, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Mailing Envelope)(BD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
