Daragjati v. Paragon California Inc
Plaintiff: Frederik Daragjati
Defendant: Paragon California Inc doing business as Bedrosians Tile and Stone
Case Number: 3:2026cv01810
Filed: July 15, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Paragon California Inc with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-25257926) filed by Frederik Daragjati. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Borges, Tanner)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daragjati v. Paragon California Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frederik Daragjati
Represented By: Tanner M. Borges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paragon California Inc doing business as Bedrosians Tile and Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?